Selection Criteria And Methodology
For the Cohort 1 Business Development Services (BDS) Training Support under Component 2 of the KJET Project, two (2) clusters per county were selected based on the approved scoring rubric. This process resulted in a total of ninety-four (94) clusters identified across Kenya’s 47 counties to benefit from classroom-based BDS support. Below are the standardized, system-generated messages that will appear when clusters query their application status on the KJET portal.
Selection Process Overview
The KJET project employs a rigorous, transparent selection process to identify clusters with the highest potential for growth and impact. Our methodology combines quantitative scoring with qualitative assessment to ensure fair and comprehensive evaluation.
Application Intake
Initial screening of submitted applications for completeness and eligibility
Data Validation
On-site visits to verify cluster information and assess operational capacity
Eligibility Screening
On-site visits to verify cluster information and assess operational capacity
Technical Scoring
Comprehensive evaluation using predefined criteria and scoring methodology
Quality Assurance
Independent review and validation of scores to ensure accuracy and fairness
Final Selection
Approval by selection committee based on overall assessment and available slots
Scoring Methodology
Weighted Scoring Framework
Assessment of governance structures, years of operation, and statutory compliance.
Review of financial stability and turnover, supported by submitted financial documents.
Evaluation of demonstrated demand, competitiveness in the value chain, and linkages to buyers/processors.
Appraisal of strategic direction, feasibility, and growth potential of proposed activities.
Confirmation of the applicant’s position within KJET priority or BETA-aligned value chains.
Consideration of women & youth participation, inclusion of persons with disabilities, and sustainable practices.
Quality Assurance and Validation
Independent Scoring and Moderation
Each eligible application was scored independently by an evaluator; spot checks were done in each of the evaluator's reviews. Where significant differences in scores were recorded, moderation sessions were held to reconcile the variations. This reduced subjectivity and reinforced the reliability of final scores.
Manual Review of Flagged Cases
Applications flagged as ineligible at the eligibility stage were subjected to another manual review before final exclusion. This step provided an additional safeguard to ensure that no cluster was disqualified due to clerical errors, incomplete formatting, or poor-quality scans.
Audit Trail and Documentation
Every step of the assessment process was documented, from eligibility decisions to scoring records. Audit logs were maintained to provide traceability and allow for independent verification of results. All application files remain archived and accessible for reference.
Selection Thresholds
Minimum Score
Clusters must achieve at least 75% overall score to be eligible
Target Clusters
94 clusters will be selected for Cohort 1
Value Chains
Clusters from all eligible value chains will be considered
View Selected Clusters
See the complete list of clusters that successfully met our selection criteria and were chosen for Cohort 1.
View Selected Clusters